What is the typical review process for manuscripts submitted to Wiley?

The review process for manuscripts submitted to Wiley typically involves several key steps designed to ensure a rigorous evaluation of the submitted work. Initially, when a manuscript is submitted, it undergoes an editorial assessment. This initial review is conducted by the journal's editorial team to determine whether the manuscript is suitable for the specific journal and meets the basic submission requirements. If the manuscript passes this preliminary evaluation, it is then sent to expert reviewers in the relevant field for a more detailed assessment. These reviewers are typically scholars or researchers who have expertise in the topic covered by the manuscript. They provide feedback on various aspects of the work, including its originality, significance, methodology, and overall contribution to the field. The reviewers usually have several weeks to complete their review, and they may recommend acceptance, rejection, or revisions to the manuscript based on their evaluation. Once the reviewers submit their feedback, the editorial team considers their comments and recommendations before making a final decision. The authors are then informed of this decision, along with any constructive feedback from the reviewers. If revisions are required, authors are typically given an opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments and resubmit the manuscript for further consideration. The entire process can take several months, depending on factors such as the responsiveness of reviewers and the complexity of the revisions requested. Wiley aims to maintain a transparent and efficient review process, and authors can often check the status of their submission through the journal's submission system. For more specific details about the review process for individual journals, it can be helpful to refer to the journal's guidelines available on the Wiley website.