How does Digg ensure the quality of submissions?

Digg employs various methods to maintain the quality of submissions on its platform. The core aspect of maintaining quality is by relying on community engagement and a voting system. All users are encouraged to submit content that they find interesting or noteworthy. However, other users on the platform play a crucial role in determining which content is seen by the broader community. When users vote on submissions, they can elevate the most popular and relevant content to the top of the feed, allowing it to gain more visibility. In addition to user voting, Digg has moderators who actively monitor submissions and comments to ensure adherence to community guidelines. These guidelines are in place to promote respectful discussions and prohibit offensive content, spam, and misleading information. This combination of community-driven decisions and oversight from moderators helps maintain a higher standard for the quality of content available. Another important aspect is the feedback mechanism within the Digg community. Users can comment on submissions, providing insights or critiques that can contribute to an ongoing conversation about quality and relevance. This dialogues help set community standards and expectations, guiding future submissions. Moreover, Digg regularly updates its algorithms and guidelines to adapt to changes in user behavior and the online environment. This iterative approach helps refine the criteria for quality submissions, ensuring that the platform remains a reliable source of curated content. For the latest information on any changes to quality checks or guidelines, users may refer to the current web page on Digg.com.